|
SYLLABUS
ANTH 214: Language, Sex, and Gender
SUMMER SESSION 2003, Term II (July 7-Aug 8)
Binghamton University
State University of New York
Class Time: MTWRF - 12:00 pm-1:40 pm
LOCATION: SW 324
Gen Ed: JN
Credit: 4
|
|
Instructor: Susan Pietrzyk
spietrz1@hotmail.com
Office hours: Tuesdays and Wednesdays 2:00-3:00 PM or by appointment
Office Location: Science I-208 (Inside Lab 206)
|
|
Course Description
This course explores the interconnections between cultural understandings
of sexed bodies, gender identities, sexualities, and communication.
There is substantial literature in both linguistic anthropology
and in sociocultural anthropology that asserts fundamental differences
between "women's language" and "men's language".
For example, these can range from minor differences in pronunciation
to major differences in the length of time speaking and frequency
of interruptions. In this course, we will investigate, complicate,
and critique this body of literature through analysis of sex, gender
and the usage of language. We will examine the ways language use
structures our daily experiences and attempt to find ways of expanding
our language to explore new possibilities for sex and gender. Course
grades are based on class participation, 2 oral presentations, 20
pages of written work, original research projects, and a final in-class
examination.
There are no prerequisites for this course.
This is an oral presentation and composition (J) course that contributes
to the fulfillment of the Harpur College Writing requirement.
Readings:
One textbook has been ordered for this class and is available at
the University Bookstore.
Gender in Cross-Cultural Perspective - Edited by Brettell and
Sargent
All other readings listed on this syllabus are on reserve in the
Reserve Room. Additional brief readings may be assigned occasionally
during the summer session; they will be placed on reserve or in
other readily accessible sources (such as newspapers or news magazines).
All readings should be completed by the class periods for which
they are assigned. Lectures and discussions will presume a familiarity
with the reading material, so be prepared to discuss the assigned
readings on the day they are due. You will be expected to demonstrate
your completion and understanding of the readings in discussion,
presentations, written work, and on the final exam.
Exams, Assignments and Grades:
The final exam will be an in-class test given on the last day of
classes. The exam will be comprehensive, meaning that it will include
information from the entire summer session.
No make-ups for the exam are possible except in case of (documented)
medical or other emergency situations and only if you notify me
BEFORE the exam.
Regular class attendance and participation in class discussions
are mandatory, especially with the concentrated nature of a summer
session course. Missing any class meeting will affect your grade.
If for whatever reason you do miss a lecture, it will be your responsibility
to get the notes, etc., from a fellow student in the class. I suggest
that you exchange emails with another student in the class for this
purpose.
Summary of grading:
| |
Class Presentations
(2)
Analytical Summary (2)
Research Methodology
Peer Reviews (3)
Final Exam
Attendance
TOTAL |
20%
20%
25%
5%
20%
10%
100% |
Description of Presentations:
Students are required to give two oral presentations during this
course, one based on a course reading which they have chosen to
present and the other based on original ethnographic mini-fieldwork
projects which all students will be required to design, execute,
and report on. Peer Reviews will be completed for both oral assignments.
For more information on Peer Reviews, see that section of the syllabus.
1. Analytical Presentation
Each student will be responsible for presenting one article to the
class, to be chosen from a list provided by the instructor. Students
will select an article during the first week of class and sign up
for specific presentation dates. The goal of this presentation is
to focus on the main point of the article as well as drawing out
a couple of interesting ideas. Do not simply outline the article
and then reread it to the class. On the day of your presentation,
each student will bring a sufficient number of handouts with information
on their presentation for the entire class. Each presentation should
be from 10-15 minutes in duration. This presentation is the
subject of your first Analytical Summary writing assignment.
2. Fieldwork Presentation
The Fieldwork Presentations will take place during the last week
of the summer session. Your presentation should focus on the research
question of your investigation, methods used for your study, and
the results from your research. For more information on the fieldwork
assignment, please read under Research Methodology in the Written
Assignments portion of this syllabus. Students should use some sort
of visual aid such as, but not limited to, handouts, slides, or
PowerPoint presentations. Students are responsible to tell the instructor
about any equipment they might need (i.e. slide or data projector)
one week in advance of their presentation. Presentations should
be from 13-15 minutes in duration.
Description of Writing Assignments
Writing, in this course, will be examined as a process of revision
and editing. In this vein, students will write drafts of their written
assignments that will be discussed in small groups and reviewed
by their peers. Students are also encouraged to visit the on-campus
Writing Center in the Library. Students should check with the Writing
Center to ensure that there is space for their appointment well
before the assignment is due as well as their summer hours.
In all writing assignments it is important to be well organized.
Students should have well thought out introductions and conclusions
for their work. Creating an outline before beginning any of your
writing assignments is required. Other requirements for the writing
assignments will be discussed in class.
Assignments that are NOT stapled together will NOT be accepted.
1. Analytical Summary (2):
The first five-page paper will be an analytical summary of an article
of the student's choice from a list provided by the instructor.
Students will choose their article during the first week of class
and sign up for presentation dates. The papers will be due on the
day after the article is presented in class. Students should
focus on the overall point of the article as well as two to three
important or interesting ideas presented through the course of the
paper. All quotes from the assigned reading should be properly cited
as discussed in class. Students should also include a bibliography
with their paper.
The second analytical summary will be based on an article of the
student's choice from the course syllabus (the last two weeks of
the summer session are exempt from this assignment). This article
will not be presented on. Students will choose and sign up for their
articles during the first week of class. All other guidelines for
the paper are the same as for the first Analytical Summary.
2. Research Methodology
The Research Methodology assignment will culminate in a 10-page
paper that details the research methodology and findings from each
student's ethnographic research project. Research Design is a particular
type of paper and requires specific types of formatting, as will
be discussed in detail in lecture. All cited material should appear
in a bibliography at the end of the paper. Please note dates for
submission of outlines, drafts, peer reviews and final versions
of papers as detailed in the Course Schedule portion of the syllabus.
Drafts of the paper will be submitted for Peer Review in class.
Mark as much on your peer's draft as you can. The more information
given, the more helpful this exercise can be. You must turn in the
marked up draft of your paper with your final paper. Do Not lose
your marked up draft. This will be worth significant points of your
final paper.
Ethnographic Research Project
Students will choose a specific "environment," as discussed
in lecture, in which to study gender roles. There should be a specific
research question to be addressed through the assignment. Students
will submit in writing a proposed research question and environment
for study to the instructor by the date specified in the syllabus.
The final paper will include the following sections, therefore these
should be kept in mind during the construction, implementation,
and recording of your research.
Research Question
This is the question upon which your research is founded. Developing
a good research question should take a fair amount of time and should
be well thought out and constructed. This section of your paper
should not be over one page in length, nor does it replace your
introduction.
Methodology
This is the nuts and bolts part of your study. In this section you
detail exactly how you went about your research: which environment
you chose, how and why you chose that environment, what exactly
did you do in your study, what observation and/or participation
techniques were used, time of day(s) when study was conducted, etc.
Options of environments that can be used for this study must be
approved by the instructor and include, but are not limited to:
a grocery store (mainstream such as PriceChopper, Giant, or Wegman's;
or a smaller store such as a local butcher or ethnic market), a
laundromat, a party, a bowling alley, a religious service (church,
mosque, temple, etc.), a sporting event, Planned Parenthood, a political
rally/meeting, Hooters, a gym, a martial arts studio, or a retail
store. In all of these environments you must be able to observe
communication (not simply between two or three people). If this
is not possible in the environment chosen, you must choose a different
environment and inform the instructor. If there is an environment
that you would like to study that is not on this list, you should
present this to the instructor for approval before any part
of the assignment is due.
Description
In this section, you should describe in detail (not too exhaustive,
please) the environment chosen and what happened during the course
of your research. Students should pay specific attention to the
built environment (architecture, structure, features, etc.), the
types of people involved (sex, gender, socio-economic level, age,
etc.), and the ways in which language is used. Look at issues such
as how the built environment structures interaction between people.
For example, how do women speak and act towards other women in that
environment, how do they speak and act towards men, and vice versa?
How is language used to both construct and reflect social norms?
How is language used to subvert the norm?
Results
In this section, students should discuss the results of their study.
This is not a place to simply repeat what you wrote in the Description
section, but to synthesize your findings and to explain what the
final outcome is. Think of the Results section as where you attempt
to answer your research question.
Relevance
Finally, students should conclude their assignments with a discussion
of the anthropological relevance of their studies. This is the section
in which each student should draw upon what has been learned about
anthropological studies through the course of this class. How is
your question anthropologically relevant? What does it contribute
to anthropology as a discipline?
Peer Reviews:
Peer Reviews will be conducted for both oral presentations and for
the draft of the Research Methodology written assignment. Copies
of the Peer Review forms for both oral and written assignments are
included at the end of this syllabus. These forms should be kept
blank in case you lose the copy provided in class. Make photocopies
of the blank forms if necessary. Directions on how to complete the
forms are given on the forms themselves. Once completed, all peer
reviews are to be returned to the instructor for evaluation. Students
will be graded on the types of advice offered to their peers as
well as how they incorporate given advice into future performance.
Policy on Late Work and Missed Exams:
No late presentations will be accepted. Late papers will drop by
one grade increment (from an A- to a B+) for each day they are late.
No make-ups for the final exam are possible except in case of (documented)
medical or other emergency and only if you notify me BEFORE the
exam.
University Policy on Plagiarism:
Academic dishonesty refers to acts of plagiarism, cheating and falsification
of research data. Plagiarism is taking and passing off as one's
own ideas, writings, computer-generated material, etc. of others:
that is, the incorporation into one's written or oral reports of
any unacknowledged published, unpublished or oral material from
the work of another. It is the right of the faculty member to whom
such reports are submitted to decide whether plagiarism has been
committed. Obviously, no faculty member makes such a determination
without evidence. Factors contributing to that determination include
the degree of dependence on unacknowledged outside material, inadequate
acknowledgement or the presence of misleading references. In any
particular course, students should contact the individual faculty
member for information about acceptable and appropriate methods
of acknowledgement.
Cheating is using or attempting to use unauthorized materials,
information or study aids in any academic exercise.
Falsification of research data involves the intentional misrepresentation
of circumstances, procedures, participants and/or results of research
projects. For additional information on what constitutes plagiarism,
contact the Writing Center, LN-120.
|
| Course Schedule: |
|
| Week 1 |
|
| Mon., July 7 |
Introduction
Go over Syllabus
Why Study This Topic?
What is an Anthropological Perspective?
Discuss: New Articles
|
| Tues., July 8 |
Sexing the Body
Biology of Sex
Constructing Sexuality
Read: Harding p. 6-17 in Constructing Sexualities (from
here out referred to as CS); Martin p. 23-33 in CS. |
| Wed., July 9 |
Sex and Population Control
Population control
Reproduction Politics
Assign: Analytical Presentation (Students choose articles and
dates) and 1st Paper. Discuss paper guidelines and citations.
Video: "Rishte, Desired Numbers, and Liberation"
Read: Watson p. 166-178 in Gender in Cross-Cultural Perspective
(from here out referred to as GC-CP); Miller p. 492-506
in GC-CP. |
| Thurs., July 10 |
Research Design and Methodology
Methods of Fieldwork
Creating Research Questions
Anthropological Relevance
Assign: Research Methodology Paper/Project; Research Question
and Environment due on Monday.
Read: Tannen Chp. 3 "Gender Differences in Conversational
Coherence" in Gender and Discourse, p. 85-136. |
| Week 2 |
|
| Mon., July 14 |
Reproduction
Cultural Construction of Menstruation
Reproductive Rights
Whose Child is this?
Read: Scheper-Hughes p. 38-45 in GC-CP; Galloway p.
70-81 in GC-CP; Brownder p 460-469 in GC-CP.
Due: Proposed Research Question and Environment |
| Tues., July 15 |
Religion and Sexuality
Judaism
Christianity
Islam
Buddhism
Read: TBA |
| Wed., July 16 |
Transgender and Same-Sex Sexualities
Transgender
Same-Sex Sexualities
Sexualities and Self-Determination
Read: Kessler and McKenna p. 223-226 in CS; Kulick p.
227-242 in CS; Blackwood p. 273-284 in CS. |
| Thurs., July 17 |
Ma Vie en Rose
Video: "Ma Vie en Rose: My Life in Pink"
Due: Research Methodology Outline
Read: Fausto-Sterling p. 166-171 in CS; Nanda p. 223-225
in CS; Lang p. 202-218 in CS. |
| Week 3 |
|
| Mon., July 21 |
Cultural Construction of Gender
How Culture Constructs/Modifies Bodies to Fit Gender
Multiplicity of Genders
Video: "In My Country: An International Perspective on
Gender"
Read: Section Intro. P. 157-161 in GC-CP; Laphere p.
100-109 in GC-CP; Ehrenberg p. 17-21 in GC-CP.
Due: Proposed Research Question and Environment |
| Tues., July 22 |
Men and Masculinity
Differences between masculinity and femininity
Masculinity and sexuality
Video: "Tough Guise Violence, Media, and the Crisis in
Masculinity"
Read: Townsend p. 120-134 in GC-CP; Herdt p. 162-165
in GC-CP; Gilmore p. 207-219 in GC-CP. |
| Wed., July 23 |
Beauty, Fashion and the Female Image
Beauty and the Body
Orientalism
Picturing the "Other"
Veiling
Video (44 min.): "Under one sky: Arab women in North America
talk about the hijab"
Read: Lutz and Collins chap. 6 "The Color of Sex: Postwar
Photographic Histories of Race and Gender". |
| Thurs., July 24 |
Ritual and Religion
Gendering of Religion
Saints and Goddesses
Due: Draft of Research Methodology (2 copies: peer and instructor)
Read: Boddy p. 397-408 in GC-CP; McIntosh p. 409-421
in GC-CP; Procter-Smith p. 432-440. |
| Week 4 |
|
| Mon., July 28 |
Rites of Passage
Female Circumcision
Male Circumcision
Video: "Fire Eyes"
Discuss: Peer Reviews
Due: Peer Review of Research Methodology
Read: Gruenbaum p. 480-491 in GC-CP; Toubia "The
Social and Political Implications of Female Circumcision: The Case
of the Sudan" p. 148-159 in Fernea (1985). |
| Tues., July 29 |
Gender and Violence
Honor Killings/ Female Infanticide
Video: "Our Honour, His Glory: Honor Killing in the Palestinian
Zone"
Read: Smuts p. 7-16 in GC-CP; Stone and James p. 307-316
in GC-CP; Zimmer-Tamakoshi p. 565-580 in GC-CP. |
| Wed., July 30 |
Gender and Race at War
What is Race?
AAA Statement on Race - So what?
Taliban
Video: Somalia: The Neglected Civil War
Read: Peach p. 22-31 in GC-CP; Van Allen p. 513-528
in GC-CP. |
| Thurs., July 31 |
Language in the Ground
Origins of Language
Language, Communication and Culture
Reading the Past
Video: "Gender and Communication: Male-Female Differences
in Language and Nonverbal Behavior"
Due: Final Research Methodology Paper (with drafts attached)
Read: Schmandt-Besserat chapter TBA. |
| Week 5 |
|
| Mon., Aug. 4 |
Gendered Communication
Gender and Discourse
Interruptions
Presentations and Discussion
Due: Fieldwork Presentations (3)
Read: Tannen Chp. 2 "Interpreting Interuption in Conversation"
in Gender and Discourse, p. 53-84. |
| Tues., Aug. 5 |
Excavating Sex and Gender
Identifying sex in human remains
Identifying gender in prehistory
Due: Fieldwork Presentations (2)
Read: Conkey and Gero, Chp. 1 "Tensions, Pluralities,
and Engendering Archaeology: An Introduction to Women and Prehistory",
p. 3-30. |
| Wed., Aug. 6 |
Food/Discussion/Review
Due: Fieldwork Presentations (2)
Class Evaluations
Snacks
Q&A |
| Thurs., Aug. 7 |
FINAL EXAM |
Notes:
*** Students with learning disabilities or other special needs, please
notify me immediately if you will need special accommodations.
BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ASSIGNED READINGS
Articles not in the assigned textbook can be found in the Reserve Room
at the library. It is suggested that you photocopy the articles, rather
than attempting to simply take notes for discussion in class. All students
(especially in a smaller class) will be expected to participate in class
discussions and will be graded accordingly.
Brettell, C. B. and C. F. Sargent (editors)
2001 Gender in Cross-Cultural Perspective. Third ed. Prentice Hall,
Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Gero, J. M. and M. W. Conkey
1991 Tensions, Pluralities, and Engendering Archaeology: An Introduction
to Women and Prehistory. In Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory,
edited by J. M. Gero and M. W. Conkey, pp. 3-30. Blackwell Publishing,
Oxford.
LaFont, S. (editor)
2003 Constructing Sexualities: Readings in Sexualities, Gender, and
Culture. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Lutz, C. A. and J. L. Collins
1993 The Color of Sex: Postwar Photographic Histories of Race and Gender.
In Reading National Geographic, pp. 155-186. University of Chicago
Press, Chicago.
Schmandt-Besserat, D.
Introduction. In Before Writing: From Counting to Cuneiform. vol.
1. University of Texas Press, Austin.
Tannen, D.
1994 Gender Differences in Conversational Coherence: Physical Alignment
and Topical Cohesion. Gender and Discourse. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Toubia, N. F.
1985 The Social and Political Implications of Female Circumcision: The
Case of the Sudan. In Women and the Family in the Middle East: New
Voices of Change, edited by E. W. Fernea, pp. 148-159. University
of Texas Press, Austin.
ANTH 214: LANGUAGE, SEX AND GENDER
PEER REVIEW FOR WRITING ASSIGNMENTS
Student's Paper Being Reviewed: ______________________________________
Reviewer's Name: _________________________________________________
As a peer reviewer, your task is to carefully read the draft assigned
to you and to constructively comment on the following questions
regarding the paper's organization, content, etc. Remember that you are
reading a draft, not the final version (and someone else is readying your
draft as well). Therefore see this as a work in progress and suggest lines
of possible revision. Give your fellow student the type of helpful comments
that you would like given to you. Please also be thorough, the more (kind)
advice you can offer your fellow student, the more beneficial this review
will be.
Please read the following questions and evaluate the assigned draft based
on their criteria. Type and print your responses and then attach this
form and your responses together with the draft you read and return to
your instructor on the due date.
1. Is the central issue clearly stated? Does the student clearly understand
the concept of fieldwork? Comment on how the focus of the essay might
be improved.
2. Is the general purpose of the paper clearly organized?
3. Are there troubling gaps (omissions) in the argument?
4. Do you see problems at the level of sentence structure that the writer
should attend to? Please flag the specific problems in the text and offer
a general comment on this question.
5. Please comment on the clarity, succinctness, and overall persuasiveness
of the essay.
6. How can this essay best be improved?
ANTH 214: LANGUAGE, SEX AND GENDER
PEER REVIEW FOR ORAL PRESENTATIONS
Student's Presentation Being Reviewed: ________________________________
Reviewer's Name: ________________________________________________
Date: _______________
As a peer reviewer, your task is to pay close attention to the presentation
of your colleagues and to constructively comment on the following
items. Each topic should be rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the
highest and 1 the lowest.
Give your fellow student the type of helpful comments that you would
like given to you. Please also be thorough, the more (kind) advice you
can offer your fellow student, the more beneficial this review will be.
Basic Expectations for Presentations:
________ Content is organized and contains analytical elements.
________ Speaker does not read, makes eye contact, adheres to time limits
(style).
________ Clarity of main point of speaker's analysis or argument (What
is it?): __________________
__________________________________________________________________________.
________ Thesis is clear, unified.
Additional Benefit:
________ Original and/or attention-getting introduction.
________ Unique and memorable conclusion.
________ Vivid details.
________ Develops topic in imaginative, creative or original way.
________ Effective speaking manner.
Further comments and constructive suggestions (may continue on back):
|